Post Calendar

January 2015
« May    

Major changes coming

A lot is going to be happening here, but it won’t all happen right away.  First I’ll be redirecting my domain to a portfolio site of sorts and will be working on a way to keep that updated until I’ve finished rebuilding this thing.  Once this site is overhauled, refreshed and redone it will probably reappear at

I can’t give an ETA on all that being done but I need to streamline and simplify everything because this thing has grown so far beyond what I can easily keep up with in a way that’s not a burden.  Once it sets in motion this rebirth (as it were) should move quickly behind the scenes.

Adobe’s Contentious Cloud


When Adobe came out with Creative Cloud it was an alternative to buying CS6.  For some it saved them money, but not everyone.  Just one year later and Adobe has decided that the Creative Cloud (CC) is the way to go.  They’re killing off perpetual licenses and offering the full suite for $50 a month or $20 a month for a program like Photoshop CC all by itself.  If you’re a user who needs the full creative suite and needs to keep up to date the $50 a month they charge for the full thing is actually a good deal; those aren’t the people who are unhappy about Creative Cloud.

Adobe says this gets you a better experience, cloud storage (although they give you a pathetic amount and who doesn’t already have 5 cloud storage options by now anyway?), and some degree of synchronization across devices.  But what’s really going on?  A huge amount of arguing apparently.

What’s the problem?

The switch to CC only is not without its issues, however there seems to be a lot of people overreacting or making wild claims that aren’t based in reality.  That’t not to say there aren’t some rational concerns about the increased cost for some users and the loss of software availability if one discontinues monthly payment.  Both of these affect me because in the past I was a version skipper.  I upgraded every second or third version which at $200 an upgrade is much cheaper than having to pay $20 a month ($240 a year) when I was buying an upgrade no sooner than every three two to three years or so.  Adobe was already cracking down on version skippers, making the upgrade availability less generous (the CS6 upgrade required CS5 before a public outcry forced Adobe to change that, for instance), but now they’ve effectively killed it off entirely.

There are also some rather extreme claims being made and some are predicting that Adobe will take this even further.  Lightroom hasn’t gone CC only but it sounds like Adobe is thinking of making Lightroom CC a reality, some of what they said makes it sound to me like that will be the better version.  Could Lightroom eventually become CC only?  Maybe, but there are some even stranger ideas out there.  Some people are running around and panicking and making claims such as how Adobe will release future PSD formats that only CC subscribers can use, or that you can no longer get Lightroom without subscribing (which is not at all true).

After enough time had passed to wind everyone up I managed to stumble across some even more interesting things.  This has gotten so blown out of proportion that responses from well known photographers range from Scott Bourne’s example of being ridiculously out of touch to Scott Kelby sounding like a thinly veiled Adobe shill.  Adobe themselves have even taken the time to respond to the kerfuffle but it hasn’t done anything to calm everyone’s nerves.  The Photoshop experience so many have enjoyed for so long has changed, and for some it’s likely going to be over because they just can’t afford it anymore.

This will help stop piracy though, right?

A lot of people have claimed that Adobe is doing this to combat piracy, however, according to Adobe the answer is no:

While service options that connect to our servers are inherently less prone to piracy, once a user downloads software to their computer the piracy threat is the same as for our perpetual products.

The reason behind the subscription-only move is the logistics of supporting two sets of software. The last 12 months of development was brutal. And there were results we were not happy with. We have decided to focus on the CC products.

Although Scott Bourne claims that everyone will hate this because it puts an end to piracy (which itself is a ridiculous argument, he’s the only one I’ve seen mention it), I don’t see any reason why we should believe this will have any impact on piracy at all.  If it does anything it will probably drive more people to pirate Adobe’s software because those who were on the edge and could afford the occasional upgrade before are left without the option.

From a technical standpoint, the claims that this will hinder piracy don’t seem to be grounded in any sort of reality.  You still download an installer from Adobe, and you install it like anything else, the difference is in how it checks for a license and activates itself.  It has to keep doing this every so often to confirm it is still being paid for.  All the pirates need to is shut off that call home and trick the software in to thinking it is active (which they’ve done before time and time again).  I can’t say when this will happen, but I can guarantee it will.  There may be some delay after each build is released but that’s no different from how it has been.  Maybe a year from now you can look at your favorite torrent site and see Photoshop CC of different vintages to choose from based on which build was pirated when.

It’s not really a matter of if, only when.

I could rant and rave further on how most anti-piracy measures only punish the paying customer, but I really don’t want that here.  Put simply though, when owning the software or owning the DVD or Blu-Ray involves worrying about DRM and licensing that may actually get in your customer’s way, you’re making the pirated experience the superior one.  In this case I don’t believe piracy was Adobe’s main goal, they simply believe they can make more money this way.

What now?

There are some good suggestions being made about how Adobe could let you buy out your license and give you a stable version to keep for as long as you like, but I don’t see that happening easily.   I think it’s going to take a lot to get Adobe to change to a model that’s more friendly to their less well off consumers, or those who don’t need every latest version.  At least they’ve acknowledged that they’re not offering a photographer friendly CC option although I’m not expecting whatever they might come up with to be any closer financially to what many are used to.

I started using Corel PhotoPaint and Draw in the mid to late 90s before switching to Adobe’s software.  The Corel stuff seemed more approachable at the time but I recall thinking Adobe’s was more capable.  Maybe that’s not true anymore, but I may be finding out down the road as I explore other options.  I figure I’ll be fine with CS5 and Lightroom for a good while (as long as Adobe doesn’t screw Lightroom up).  For the other companies out there this could prove to be a great opportunity as people seek asylum from Adobe’s new pricing and licensing shenanigans.

Making the most of a trip


I was in the Daytona Beach area of Florida for two weeks back in November and unfortunately it wasn’t a trip for shooting.  Florida wouldn’t be my first choice as a photography destination, I like a little vertical displacement in the terrain, but I wanted to at least try to get [...]

Continue reading Making the most of a trip

CrashPlan is free for a year!

Do you have files on your computer?  Do you care about any of those files?  Would you pay $50 to protect your important files against a hard drive crash, house fire or zombie uprising?  Would you pay $0 for that same protection?

I’ve already been paying for Carbonite for a few years but I [...]

Continue reading CrashPlan is free for a year!

Corbett’s Glen is nice


Corbett’s Glen is a fairly sizeable park right in the middle of everything in Rochester that I’ve heard of throughout the years but never made it to.  When Taima and I arranged to work together it seemed like the perfect chance to check this location out.   I’m glad we did because it’s [...]

Continue reading Corbett’s Glen is nice

Mertensia Park & Mud Creek with Sarah


Mud Creek is an aptly named creek running through Mertensia Park (and right behind the car dealership I use).  It’s a not-terribly-cool creek which fittingly has a lot of mud in the water and on the rocks.  It doesn’t flow very fast and there are some pretty big nursery web spiders on a [...]

Continue reading Mertensia Park & Mud Creek with Sarah

Catching up


There’s an awful lot going on that’s got my mind spread pretty thin.  Getting ready to move in a couple months is a bigger hassle than I’d like but hopefully things will settle once that’s done!  I just did some site updates today which as usual is a mixture of things working and things [...]

Continue reading Catching up

In the studio with Amanda

_T4G4574 1

Amanda and her MUA friend Liv joined me for a nice shoot back in February at the studio.  We had a good time doing a number of things but this was one of my favorites.  I tried to get a good balance of color and key off the red detail in the makeup by [...]

Continue reading In the studio with Amanda

The full frame battle returns

It was a few years ago but Canon and Nikon have been here before.  The two top dogs in the 35mmish world have brought out their new “mid-range” full frame DSRs within a month of each other.  Both look pretty good to me although I’m not 100% convinced about either.  I’m ready at this [...]

Continue reading The full frame battle returns

January Randomness

January went by too quickly but I did get to do a little shooting, mostly with people.  I’ve been rather disappointed with the weather this winter, it’s really killed my interest in shooting outside for some reason.  I think that if it’s winter I just expect that there should be snow around to enjoy [...]

Continue reading January Randomness